Out-of-Network Denials
What to Do After an Out-of-Network Denial
An out-of-network denial means a provider or facility does not have a contracted rate with your health plan. Whether that is appealable generally depends on why the care happened out of network in the first place, not simply that it did.
Is This a Surprise or Emergency Bill?
Emergency care or a surprise bill is a separate topic
If this involves emergency care, a provider working at an in-network facility, or a bill that exceeds what federal or state surprise-billing protections allow, see the separate guide on surprise and emergency billing instead. Where surprise-billing protections apply, cost sharing is generally calculated from a recognized amount, which is the Qualifying Payment Amount (QPA) unless an All-Payer Model Agreement or a specified state law applies. QPA is not the universal cost-sharing basis in every state and funding type.
Is This a Network Gap Request?
Requesting coverage before you get care is a separate process
If you have not yet received care and want the plan to approve an out-of-network provider in advance because no in-network specialist is reasonably available, see the dedicated network gap exception guide, which covers the pre-service request process separately from this post-service appeal guide.
What the Denial Means
Voluntary out-of-network care versus a network problem
-
Voluntary out-of-network care is usually excluded
If you chose an out-of-network provider when in-network options were reasonably available, most plans are contractually entitled to deny the claim or apply significantly higher cost sharing. This fact pattern is generally not appealable on network grounds alone.
-
A network gap can support an exception
If no in-network provider was reasonably available within your plan's time-and-distance or specialty-access standards, that can support a network gap exception. The appeal should document the search for an in-network option, the distances or wait times involved, and the plan's own network-adequacy standard.
-
A directory error is a different, provable problem
If the plan's provider directory listed the provider as in-network at the time you sought care, keep the screenshot, printout, or call reference number. Several states allow consumers to be held to the in-network cost-sharing amount when they reasonably relied on an inaccurate directory.
-
Continuity of care can apply to an ongoing course of treatment
If you were already in an active course of treatment with a provider who left the network, or a plan or employer changed carriers, some plans and states allow a transition period at in-network cost sharing. This is distinct from a one-time network gap and depends heavily on plan and state rules.
-
A plan-processing error is different from a provider payment dispute
If the plan misapplied its own network-adequacy or directory rules when adjudicating the claim, that is a plan error a member appeal can address. If instead a provider is trying to collect more than your plan allows, that is a provider billing dispute, which is a different problem with a different resource.
-
External review is generally unavailable for a purely contractual denial
Because a voluntary out-of-network denial usually rests on network status rather than clinical judgment, external review generally does not apply the way it does for a medical necessity denial. State regulators can still be relevant for directory-accuracy complaints.
Build the File
Documents worth gathering
-
Denial notice and EOB
-
Insurance card
-
Provider directory screenshot or printout showing in-network status
-
Call reference numbers if you confirmed network status by phone
-
Evidence of the search for an in-network provider, including distances and wait times
-
The plan document or Summary Plan Description's network-adequacy language
-
Any prior authorization or referral tied to the visit
Check Your Fact Pattern
Does a network gap or directory error apply?
Remedy Support currently screens out-of-network denials tied to a directory error, a network gap, or a similar plan adjudication error, not voluntary out-of-network choice.
Directory error, network gap, or no in-network option was available
This is the fact pattern Remedy Support currently screens for a member appeal.
Check Whether Your Case Is EligibleYou chose an out-of-network provider for other reasons
Voluntary out-of-network care is usually a contractual exclusion and is outside the current baseline service. Review your plan's out-of-network benefit, if any, and the Summary Plan Description before appealing.
Common Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Will insurance pay if I chose to go out of network?
Generally no, unless you can show an emergency, a directory error, or that no in-network provider was reasonably available.
What is a network gap exception?
A request to have out-of-network care treated at in-network cost sharing because no in-network provider was reasonably available for the needed service.
How do I prove the directory was wrong?
Screenshots, printouts, or saved pages showing the provider listed as in-network at the time of your visit, plus any call reference numbers if you confirmed network status by phone.
Is every out-of-network denial eligible for external review?
No. A purely contractual out-of-network denial generally does not qualify for external review the way a clinical medical-necessity denial does.