Prior Authorization Denials
What to Do After a Prior Authorization Denial
A prior authorization denial means your plan reviewed a proposed treatment before it happened and decided it does not meet the plan's specific coverage guidelines. That is different from a missing prior authorization, where the provider never submitted a request at all. This page covers a denial that was actually reviewed and rejected.
Scope
This page covers nonurgent, pre-service denials
Remedy Support screens nonurgent prior authorization denials. Urgent, concurrent-care, and highly clinical matters may require a faster or different process than a standard administrative appeal, including an expedited review your plan is required to provide. If your care is urgent, use your plan's expedited appeal process, not this workflow.
Not the Same Denial
Denied is not the same as missing or mismatched
If your provider never submitted a prior authorization request in the first place, that is a different fact pattern with a different first step; see the separate guide on a missing prior authorization. If authorization was approved but the claim was billed with a different code, date, or facility than what was approved, that is a mismatch the provider typically needs to correct, not a denial to appeal.
How This Usually Works
Understanding a prior authorization denial
-
Read the denial letter for the actual reason
A prior authorization denial can rest on a step-therapy requirement that was not met, missing documentation of conservative treatment tried first, an out-of-network facility when an in-network option existed, or a straightforward medical necessity determination. The specific reason drives what evidence the appeal needs.
-
Was authorization approved but mismatched to the claim?
Sometimes authorization was actually granted, but the claim that was later submitted used a different procedure code, date of service, provider, or facility than what was approved. That is a provider-side correction — a corrected claim or an authorization update — not a member appeal, and it commonly resolves faster than a formal appeal.
-
Peer-to-peer review and a member appeal are not the same track
Your provider may request a peer-to-peer conversation with the plan's medical director to try to resolve the denial informally. That process is useful, but it does not automatically pause or extend your own appeal deadline. Remedy Support does not participate in peer-to-peer review. Track your deadline in parallel even while a peer-to-peer review is pending.
-
Build the clinical record
A strong appeal identifies the plan's own medical policy or coverage bulletin and responds to its specific criteria, rather than arguing in general terms. Clinical notes, test results, records of prior treatments that did not work, and a letter of medical necessity from the treating provider are the core of the file.
-
External review is a separate, qualified process
External review is a separate process whose availability and deadline depend on the plan, funding arrangement, denial type, state, and current federal rules. It is not part of Remedy Support's baseline $49 service, and it is not guaranteed for every internal appeal that is upheld.
Build the File
Documents worth gathering
-
Denial notice and EOB
-
Insurance card
-
Plan document or Summary Plan Description
-
The prior authorization request and its cited reason for denial
-
Clinical notes and treatment history
-
Records of any conservative treatment already tried
-
A letter of medical necessity from the treating provider
-
The plan's medical policy or coverage bulletin, if available
-
Peer-to-peer review notes, if one occurred
Check the Deadline Language
There is no single universal deadline
Many ERISA-governed group health plans must provide at least 180 days to appeal an adverse benefit determination, measured from when you received the denial notice. The denial notice and controlling plan documents determine the deadline and starting event for your specific claim. A peer-to-peer review or other provider correction does not automatically extend that deadline.
Nonurgent, post-service or scheduled care
This is the fact pattern Remedy Support currently screens: a proposed or completed service, reviewed and denied on administrative or clinical grounds, with time remaining on the appeal deadline.
Check Whether Your Case Is EligibleUrgent or concurrent care
Urgent and concurrent-care matters fall outside the current baseline service and need your plan's expedited review process, which federal rules generally require to be decided quickly.
Common Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Is a prior authorization denial the same as a missing prior authorization?
No. A denial means the plan reviewed the request and rejected it. A missing authorization means the provider never submitted a request. See the separate guide for a missing authorization.
Can my doctor appeal for me?
A treating provider can support the appeal with clinical documentation and can request a peer-to-peer review, but the formal member appeal is typically filed by or on behalf of the member using the plan's own procedure.
What is a peer-to-peer review?
A direct conversation between the treating provider and the plan's medical director intended to resolve the denial informally. It does not replace the formal member appeal and does not automatically pause your deadline.
Do I always get an external review?
External review is commonly available when the denial rests on a clinical judgment, but availability, process, and deadlines depend on your plan type and state. It is not guaranteed for every denial.